#SCRIVENER WINDOWS VS MAC 2016 KEYGEN#
People quickly realized that the organizational scheme can be flexed for other purposes. TEMPLATES!!! The power of Scrivener templates is amazing.That's simply unforgivable for it to happen in the native OS where the ap was originally designed to function. And when I talked to my Windows friends about it, they told me it was just as slow to boot up in Windows, super-duper slow (by Mac standards). That iteration of MS Word was criminally bad, felonious, took forever to boot up, and for reasons beyond my ken, every time I tried to change fonts, it spun up my external hard-drive, because yeah, that's where people store their fonts, on an external. This ap saved me from the torture that was MS Word 2011 for Mac. It has one job and one job only - help create a manuscript. Like most Mac aps, it doesn't try to be a jack of all trades packed in bloatware (looking at you MS Office). It looks, walks, and talks like a Mac ap. Scrivener is originally a Mac ap and though it certainly comes for Windows and Linux, the application's Mac ancestry is very much evident. You can have that and you don't have to adjust everything at the end. That may sound like just a silly frill, but say your vision isn't great and making use of a larger on-screen font, or one that's just easier to read, is something you need. If I wanted (I don't, but for argument's sake) a Gothic font with Elvira as the backround image, I can have that, and the ap still spits out a perfectly conservative, perfectly formatted, standard Schunn style manuscript in 12 point, double spaced Courier. You can set the GUI up in many different ways, different colors, textures, fonts, etc., and this never - NEVER - alters the output of the manuscript.You use the tools that make sense to you and ignore the ones you don't. The functionality is very tightly bundled and clean.
I don't know if there is a similar ecosystem of aps for the Scrivener clones. Aeon Timeline is powerful, but whoever made that ap was clearly making it for an already initiated in-group.Īnd there are other aps and utilities specifically designed to play along with Scrivener, like custom page formatting aps for that snazzier, bespoke look, and grammar and style checkers that have direct access to your Scrivener files. It's visually clean and simple and clearly designed with the novice end-user in mind. You can create outlines and plot progressions in those aps and then export them to Scrivener. If you're a planner, aps like Plottr and Aeon Timeline speak the same language as Scrivener. This is where things get really nice with Scrivener, the way other aps have capitalized on Scrivener's success in this particular niche market. So, on that level of engagement, yes, you actually can come up with a similar organizational scheme on your own, but in such a scheme, you, the human, are the glue that holds that scheme together, and sadly you, the human, do not come ready-made to accept integration with other applications. Isn't this just taking that and compartmentalizing it?" Now, it's easy to play around with an ap like Scrivener and the many subsequent clones that have hit the market and think "Okay, but I can do something similar with just the file system dynamic of my computer. Click to expand.This is easily Scrivener's most appealing selling point, its organizational paradigm.
0 kommentar(er)
